Wiseman + Rohy Structural Engineers scammed a potential employee. Little do they know that everyone knows of their hostile work environment.


Have you ever wanted to play wackamole with your profession?  Have you ever wanted to be treated with disrespect?  Have you ever wanted to experience professional immaturity?  Well, now you can by applying to work in the structural engineering profession at Wiseman + Rohy in San Diego, CA.

Here is the ad they posted on the SEAOSD website:

Wiseman + Rohy is a full service Structural Engineering company with four decades of quality projects constructed around the United States. Most of these projects are in Southern California, but recent projects have been in Hawaii, Washington, Oregon and New Mexico. We have the advantage of being an established company with a lot of young energy.
Wiseman + Rohy Structural Engineers focuses on retaining quality engineers to ensure a quality design. We encourage our engineers to advance as quickly as possible and take on as many different types of projects as soon as possible. This is a unique opportunity to show your skills while keeping your career interesting.
Wiseman + Rohy Structural Engineers has an extremely diverse list of clients. Our projects are equally varied and include corporate, theater, hanger, religious, medical and educational projects.

Job Title: Project Engineer / Project Manager

Job Start Date: Wednesday, August 17, 2016

Job Description:

Wiseman + Rohy Structural Engineers is looking for an engineer with over 5 years of experience in structural engineering. This position offers the opportunity to participate in challenging and unique projects in all types of commercial structures.

Job Requirements:

Attitude that is focused on responsiveness and superior client service
BS degree in Structural Engineering
Proficient in the design of concrete, steel, masonry and wood structures
Construction Administration experience
Experience with writing reports
Demonstrates experience interacting with clients and staff on projects
Ability to manage projects while working on concurrent projects
Excellent written and verbal communication skills and strong analytical skills
Registered Professional Engineer (P.E.) in California
The responsibilities of this position include producing design calculations and construction documents, coordination with the design team and team members within our office, construction administration services and management of other engineers for a wide variety of projects. The job allows for engineers to see a project from design all the way through construction.
We are looking for a highly motivated engineer to become a long-term part of this established company. We pride ourselves in all of our long-term employees and feel this is due to our varied projects and good working environment.



At first glance, the ad appears to be OK.  The problem is that this ad does not affect reality of Wiseman + Rohy whatsoever.  Let us explain why:

“a lot of young energy” means they perform the illegal act of discriminating against candidates 30 and up.  One applicant for the position wanted to work for this firm because (s)he felt their cultures and engineering work meshed.  Jim Wiseman wrote the candidate an email stating he wanted the candidate to see his excellent company.  But when that candidate took Jim Wiseman up on his offer, Jim Wiseman immediately rescinded the candidate’s application to the company.  For Jim Wiseman and his staff, every day is April Fools Day because he advertises jobs that are nonexistent.

“retaining quality engineers” is another false statement W+R puts in their job ad, evidenced by the firm withdrawing the candidacy of a person who is more than qualified.  And when we say qualified, we mean having 15 plus years of experience and a California Structural Engineering License.  But his ad states he is looking for someone with only 5 years of experience.  Translation:  W+R wants to pay their employees as little as possible!

“demonstrates working with clients” is a slap in the face.  This firm Wiseman + Rohy cannot even demonstrate how they work with potential job applicants who know their clients.


Wiseman + Rohy also has major recruiting problems.  If you check out their former employees’ LinkedIn pages, their claim for long-term employment does not hold water at all.  Just check out the LinkedIn profiles of people who have worked there:

Just ask Barry Speer, currently the regional manager of Donan, who was stuck in the Project Engineer position for 9 years.  Jim Wiseman treats engineers like cogs in a wheel until he can no longer use them.

Another employee W+R treated like garbage is Rosella Moreno.  She only worked for W+R for 8 months before leaving to work for the city of San Diego.

Another employee named Lindsay Patch left W+R after a mere 16 months to work for a contractor.

How does Wiseman + Rohy retain quality engineers if they leave in such a short time?  Answer:  they can’t!

What do all of these people have in common?  They all left because Wiseman + Rohy was too busy screwing them.  For all people know, they could have been fired for no reason at all.

Also, you may notice that Wiseman + Rohy has been attempting to recruit engineers from as far away as Washington. Ask yourself:  why would they do this?  Because their reputation as an engineering firm stinks as much as limburger cheese!

It is so bad at Wiseman + Rohy that one of their Directors of Marketing left after a very short time working there!  Just check out the LinkedIn profile!


We are pretty lucky to get some proof about the recruiting problems Wiseman + Rohy has in attracting qualified people.  Look at the emails where a candidate named Michael asked about arranging an office visit while he was vacationing in San Diego.  As anyone knows, it is great for people to check out the office before they decide to work for Wiseman + Rohy.


WR Email 1

WR Email 2

Did you notice how James Wiseman’s tone changed when they wanted an office visit?  There are many explanations. The best one is that Wiseman + Rohy was looking to fire an employee at the firm without telling them about it.  And the reason may or may not be legitimate.  We would not be surprised if it were a person with a California Structural Engineering License.


Wiseman + Rohy wants candidates to write out their entire job history.  The real reason Wiseman + Rohy does this is that they need free consulting to write job ads.  Why else would Jim Wiseman do this?  What James Wiseman doesn’t know is that he breaks state laws by making employees, potential and current, work for free!

And why would this firm do such a thing?  Does his firm have a high turnover rate?  We bet it does.

Heck, they even harassed an applicant over 40.  What makes people think W+R will not break the other employment laws?  We do not know about that, but we bet you would not even go near them in the future,


Even worse yet, Wiseman + Rohy is too busy screwing candidates over who happen to develop business opportunities for them.  For example, one of Brandon Deems’ projects was the Regal Theater in Issaquaah, WA.  For those that do not know, Regal was busted for cutting employees’ hours to get out of giving them health care.  That city happens to be the HQ for Costco.  Costco is the 8th largest retailer in the world.  The candidate his dumb firm interviewed with happened to help Costco get more locations built and expand their business with his/her ideas.  So W+R has no problem shooting themselves in the foot.

For Wiseman + Rohy, treating candidates like crap appears to be a way of life.

Who are the employees who work there?  Notice very few have advanced engineering degrees.

Steven Crook, SE – 1998 Grad of Cal Poly SLO

Jim Wiseman, SE – 1988 Grad of Cal Poly SLO

Steve Rohy, SE – 1992 Grad of Cal Poly SLO

Michael Sims – 2013 Masters Grad of UCLA

David Maestas – 2003 grad of University of Wyoming


Folks, there are plenty of things that people can do about Wiseman + Rohy.  The easiest way they can do this is to avoid doing business with their clients.  It is much easier than people think.

If you want to go to the movies, avoid the Regal and Century/Cinemark Theaters.  Wiseman + Rohy designs them.

Do you want to buy your next new or used automobile?  Avoid AutoNation dealerships.  Wiseman + Rohy designed them, too.

Are you looking for some office space to rent?  Do not get it from City Heights Center in San Diego.

Do you need to go to a hospital?  Avoid the Scripps Memorial Hospital in Chula Vista.

Retailers, are you looking to locate your business in a shopping center?  Avoid Bella Terra in Huntington Beach.

This list will be updated constantly as we find out more information.  For right now, you can think of the firm as unWiseman + Whore-y!




Building officials are the most trusted people when it comes to construction and design of buildings.  The public’s safety is quite literally in their hands.  But all Building Officials are not this caring.  Building Officials can be unethical.  In fact, they can do unethical things like run employment scams.  Let us introduce you to one such person:  Novato, CA, Chief Building official Annette Chavez.  Annette Chavez did the unthinkable before coming to the city of Novato, CA:  Annette Chavez ran an employment scam where engineers were scammed for jobs.  They applied for one fulltime position, but were offered one part-time position with as few hours as possible, about as many hours as men using the bathroom for 3 months!

We got emails from Annette Chavez while she was employed at the Roseville, CA, office of Willdan.


Back in December 2014, Mr. X applied for a plan review position at Willdan for the Supervising Plan Check Engineer position in Roseville, CA.  Here is the ad they posted on their website:

“We currently have an opening for a Supervising Plan Check Engineer in our Roseville, California office.  The qualified candidate will be responsible for overseeing plan review (architectural and structural) for commercial and private buildings to ensure compliance with building code regulations.  The qualified candidate will also provide Building Official services to local jurisdictions when necessary.


  • BSCE

  • ICC Building Official Certification

  • ICC Plan Examiner Certification

  • 5 – 10 yrs plan check experience

  • Professional Registration in California

  • Municipal experience

  • Thorough knowledge of building codes

  • Excellent written and oral communication skills”


Since Mr. X was a certified as a Chief Building Official and a California Licensed Structural Engineer, this position would be a great fit.  Mr. X was a plan reviewer at three different jurisdictions, two of which were in California.

Mr. X had a phone interview and an in-person interview in their Roseville office with Willdan employee Annette Chavez (now Annette Chavez, the Chief Building Official for the city of Novato, CA) and Michael Graham.  The problem is that it was for a Plan Review Engineer position for Willdan instead of the one Mr. X applied for.  Annette Chavez decided to pull a bait-and-switch with this applicant.

Willdan employee Annette Chavez (now Annette Chavez, the Chief Building Official for the city of Novato, CA) promised the proverbial moon because she said there would be lots of work to do.  She stated there would be at least 30 hours of work a week.

After Mr. X signed the job offer, they never gave him any work to do for several weeks.  This should have been a red flag.  No work showed up for weeks on end.  Willdan employee Annette Chavez (now Annette Chavez, the Chief Building Official for the city of Novato, CA) was mentally AWOL by not returning Mr. X’s calls.  When it did show up, it was as only for a two hours a week many months later.  Mr. X knew this was not going to be a full time job like they stated.

Chavez Email 022015 A
Annette Chavez email to employee about WillDan offer

PARs letter


Check out the email and offer letter, folks.  On the top is the email from Annette Chavez representing WillDan.  On the bottom is the offer letter from Public Agency Resources.  Looks like someone named Annette Chavez is scamming job seekers, don’t you think?  We say a big fat yes!  PAR is the company that WillDan uses to avoid paying benefits to their employees as required in their contracts.

Guess how many hours Mr. X actually got?  15 hours for the whole year!  That is the equivalent amount of time for men spend using the bathroom for three months.  The work stopped coming a short time later.  Mr. X did not consider this a full-time job at all.  And why would a company like Willdan do this?  There could be plenty of reasons for this:

  1. They were looking to use Mr. X’s name in proposals to get work. When they didn’t get the work, they gave Mr. X none.
  2. They were cheaping out on salary and benefits, because they have none.
  3. They were using Mr. X until they could find someone much cheaper.
  4. Willdan did not want Mr. X working for someone else. That is pretty stupid when the contract says that Mr. X have to find a full time position.
  5. Willdan wanted samples of Mr. X’s review letters so they could get free consulting.

But why does a company run ads requesting engineers and then not have the work for them to do?  Nowhere in the contract does it mention that Mr. X would have to ask for the work at all.

What really should have tipped Mr. X off is that the name of the firm was changed to Public Agency Resources, compliments of Willdan employee Annette Chavez (now Annette Chavez, the Chief Building Official for the city of Novato, CA).  And they have no benefits at all for their employees!  When Mr. X interviewed with Willdan employee Annette Chavez (now Annette Chavez, the Chief Building Official for the city of Novato, CA), Michael Graham & Patrick Johnson, Mr. X was told there would have 30 to 40 hours a week of work because they were so busy.  This firm reminded us of a Joe Isuzu ad where they lied about their cars in an effort to sell them!

In addition to the bogus job interview, Mr. X was never even given a company computer or engineering software to use.  Mr. X wrote a Glassdoor review to remind other people not to fall for their scams, the ones invented by Annette Chavez.

Engineering is about trust.  This is pretty important because people need to be told that their buildings and structures are safe.  So what kind of message does Willdan send their clients when they cannot even be accurate about the amount of work they give their employees to do?  Even better yet, why would people trust someone who lies about career opportunities?  And why would their clients trust them or use them when it comes to building plan review?  If this is how they are when it comes to work at their firm, just imagine how they are when it comes to public safety?  Do you think they would tell the truth?  Based on Mr. X’s encounter, the answer is a big fat no!

Is this what Willdan CEO Thomas Brisbin meant when he said:  “After the recession, we said to ourselves, ‘The world has changed, and we better change with it.”?  Brisbin is partially right because all Mr. X was left with was change!

We even contacted Willdan’s CEO Daniel Chow and he admitted they do this scam all the time.  He told us Annette Chavez came up with this idea.

Look what they did with the city of Glendale, CA.

The city of Glendale, CA, sued WillDan in 2014 for making fundamental mistakes in a water study that cost that city a loss of $9 million!

We wonder what CEO Thomas Brisbin, CFO Stacy McLaughlin, and Senior VO of Corporate Development Mike Bieber would do about this issue.  So far, we have heard nothing from them.

And because their clients are municipalities, do the municipalities know what is going on?  We do not know about that, but they have the right to know.

Annette Chavez, the Chief Building Official for the city of Novato, CA, is not even a Licensed Professional Engineer in the state of California.  How can Annette Chavez , the Chief Building Official for the city of Novato, CA, tell people how good they are as engineers when she is not one herself.


You need to ask yourselves why a city like Novato, CA, would hire someone who does this to people who want to work with like Annette Chavez, the Chief Building Official for the city of Novato, CA.  We believe the city politicians had no idea what is going on.  Now they will all be briefed about the scams pulled by this woman.  We emailed this to everyone in Novato City Hall and all of her staff.  We even used this as an economic development tool against the city of Novato, CA.

If there are any single guys reading this, they need to ask themselves if they would date Annette Chavez.  Based on the information highlighted here, men should not want to consider dating her.  If Annette Chavez, the Chief Building Official for the city of Novato, CA, is this deceptive to job applicants, just imagine how she is with dating men.

Annette Chavez, the Chief Building Official for the city of Novato, CA, needs to herself a favor and resign immediately.  If Annette Chavez, the Chief Building Official for the city of Novato, CA, doesn’t, we will be campaigning against every politician who appointed you.  We will be setting up shop all over Novato and showing off Annette Chavez’s scams.  Annette Chavez, the Chief Building Official for the city of Novato, CA, is proof she is the Chief Building Official you cannot trust.


Anil Verma Associates Uses Job Interviews For Free Consulting

Liz Ryan wrote in one of her LinkedIn columns that people should not give the keys to the proverbial castle in interviews.  That is because unethical companies will use you for free consulting.   Let us introduce you to one such firm: Anil Verma Associates.  For those who do not know who they are, Anil Verma Associates is a consultant for public agencies that design mass transit systems.  The San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit System (or BART) is one of their clients.

You can check out this link to see if you are one of Anil Verma’s clients.


Back in 2012, Anil Verma Associates posted a job opening for a Senior Structural Engineering position on the SEAONC website.

Anil Verma Associates, Inc. (AVA) is currently seeking for an energetic, motivated, and detail-oriented to join our Milpitas/Oakland, CA staff as Sr. Structural Engineer/Structural Engineer. The qualified candidate will have the following required experience:

  • Minimum 10 years of experience in design of building and transit structures with knowledge of utilizing reinforced and prestressed concrete, structural steel and masonry
  • Knowledgeable in structural modeling and analysis with application of structural software (e.g. SAP 2000 and RISA programs).
  • Proficiency in application of the AISC, ACI, ASCE7, and California Building Codes
  • Familiar with the LRFD criteria
  • Designs and develops structural plans and details; experience in Auto CAD is a plus
  • Coordinates with other disciplines as required
  • S. in Civil Engineering; M.S. in Structural Engineering, preferred
  • E. Structural License in California is required
  • Great verbal and written communication skills are a must

This applicant has designed with all of these materials and both buildings and bridges.  (S)he exceed many of these requirements.  Vic Zikoor called him/her in for an interview.  The applicant was excited because (s)he thought this was their dream job.


Pictured above:  Vic Zikoor & Dary Haghighi

Instead of asking the applicant questions about his/her experiences and what he/she could bring to Anil Verma, Daryoush Haghighi asked the applicant questions about the Berryessa BART Station.  Daryoush Haghighi was asking the applicant very technical questions. Obviously, Daryoush Haghighi had no experience designing structures per the California Building Code.  Daryoush Haghighi could not tell what the lateral system in the Berryessa BART Station was.

Most people would feel like they were used.  The applicant certainly felt like he/she was being used.  The applicant decided to have some fun with it.  The applicant thought of a situation where (s)he was the smart kid being bullied for my homework.  Guess what he/she did?  (S)he gave Daryoush Haghighi the wrong information for the project.  (S)he told him that the transit station could be built using wood instead of structural steel.  Most of the applicant’s ideas were ridiculously outrageous.  The applicant thought Daryoush Haghighi would have consulted with the architects in his office first.  Later, you will read what happened.

If only Anil Verma Associates had checked Daryoush Haghighi’s resume before hiring him, they would have discovered quite a few red flags.  The applicant found this information in 5 seconds using Google!

According to his online resume, his body of experience before 2012 included:

  • The design of the Alsea Bay Bridge in Waldport, Oregon
  • Main Street Interchange bridges over I-5 freeway in Orange County, CA
  • The seismic bridge retrofit of the I-280 Southern Freeway Viaduct in San Francisco, California, the SR 91 HOV bridges in Orange County, CA, and the I-5/I-8 Interchange Bridges in San Diego, CA.
  • Dangsan Steel Railway Bridge Replacement Project located in Seoul, South Korea

Notice there is NOT one building project in his resume before 2012.  Bridges in seismically active California behave much differently that buildings in California.

Guess what happened after the applicant’s interview?  Vic Zikoor of Anil Verma Associates sent the applicant an email stating they had no work.  The applicant really felt used after that interview.  Why do firms post ads for non-existent jobs?  In Vic Zikoor’s case, he just wanted to see what was out there.  Or Vic Zikoor and Daryoush Haghighi were really jealous of the applicant and his/her abilities.  Our sources told the applicant that they had no approval to post that position.



The applicant went to work for him/herself designing the BART Milpitas station for another consultant.  The applicant learned later that Daryoush Haghighi & Vic Zikoor presented the applicant’s lousy ideas to the BART Engineers.  They were struck down by the architects and engineers who knew the building code better than they did.  Daryoush Haghighi & Vic Zikoor were literally ridiculed in the meeting.

As for Daryoush Haghighi, he was fired by Anil Verma Associates in 2013.  You can check out his LinkedIn profile so you can see it for yourself.

When BART reviewed the Berryessa Station design, they had over 10,000 design and constructability comments.  The applicant would have figured it out right away.  It took the AVA design team several months to resolve the issues.  AVA decided to hire another structural engineer.  We bet they had to pay big money for him to resolve all the plan check comments.


In 2014, Anil Verma Associates posted the Structural Engineer position again.  The applicant decided to interview for it again.  Maybe AVA got additional work from other transit agencies.  The applicant felt that because (s)he had experience designing the BART Milpitas station, (s)he would be very qualified be part of the design team.  The applicant was completely wrong.

The applicant took a phone call from Vic Zikoor.  The applicant turned on the speaker so people could hear it.  Vic Zikoor told (s)he the position was only for part-time work.  When the applicant asked him why the position was for part-time work, Vic Zikoor stated that he wanted the firm to keep the younger people on the payroll because they were cheaper.  We could tell he posted the ad because he needed someone to resolve an immediate issue.  When the applicant asked whether he would receive a call back, Vic Zikoor stated he would.  What Vic Zikoor failed to recall is that the applicant saved his previous emails.

The applicant recapped everything that was discussed in the email (s)he sent him.


Based on my last encounter in 2012, the work never materialized with AVA after I had my interview with you.  You said it was canceled.  Back in 2012, you posted a Craigslist ad and a SEAONC stating you had work.  After the in-person interview, you asked me for a start date.  Instead of a start date, you stated the job never materialized via email.  Vic Zikoor, why does AVA advertise non-existent jobs?  I have attached the email you sent back in 2012.

Also, why would you hire me part-time?  If you are building a structural engineering team for AVA, don’t you want people to service the job during all stages?  Does AVA value the SE license?  Apparently not from what I have seen!  As you said over the phone, you have to keep the young people at AVA instead of experienced people like myself.
You and your firm cried wolf too many times in the past.  This time, I think this is another trick because of what happened the last time.  Except this time I am not falling for it.  Based on what has happened to me in the past, I note when companies do this to me so that others know who they are and refuse to do business with them.  I have even convinced major retailers not to supply their products in their stores.  It’s worked!

That’s my two cents.  Contact me when you have a place where I can develop my career instead of a part-time job.  As you said, your firm only offers part time work!

The Applicant, SE

Still looking for a design job designing actual structures”


The applicant never heard from Vic Zikoor or Anil Verma Associates after that.  In 2015, he left Anil Verma Associates.  We think he was mad because of all the bad publicity we gave him.   After all, if we owned Anil Verma Associates, we would have fired Vic Zikoor a long time ago.  As for owner Anil Verma, he never contacted the applicant about his/her bad recruiting experience with Vic Zikoor.  It is a shame because unlike that bar Cheers, it is not necessary a good thing when everyone knows your name.


A member of Structural Stupidists had a blast a few days ago.  (S)he had another bad interview with a major municipality.  This municipality is one of the largest cities in the U.S.  It is the city of San Jose, CA.

The man pictured above is Chu Chang, San Jose’s Chief Building Official.

The city of San Jose recently posted an ad for their Plan Review positions. It is posted below.  (S)he decided to apply and was invited to be interviewed.  (S)he had been interviewed 9 times before and never received an offer.  Honestly, (s)he did think the 10th time would be the charm.  Boy was (s)he wrong!


City of San José

About the Department

The City of San José, the Capital of Silicon Valley, is one of the nation’s best managed cities and one of the top ten cities in which to live, work, and do business. Moreover, San José is the center of cultural, government and economic activity for the region. The employees of the City of San José have embraced the following values: Integrity, Innovation, Excellence, Collaboration, Respect and Celebration.

The City’s Planning, Building and Code Enforcement Department is seeking an individual whose values align with the values of the City’s employees.

The Planning, Building and Code Enforcement Department’s mission is to facilitate the preservation and building of a safe, attractive, vibrant and sustainable San José through partnership with and exceptional service to our diverse communities and customers.

Job Title: Associate Engineer (Plan Check)

Job Start Date: Wednesday, May 4, 2016

Job Description:

Position and Duties

The Department is currently recruiting to fill an Associate Engineer (Plan Check) position in the Plan Review Services Division with duties including, but are not limited to:

– Advising professional engineers, architects and others concerning code requirements, engineering and planning problems arising in the preliminary design of buildings and structures.

– Examining plans, calculations and specifications for residential, multi-family, commercial and industrial buildings, including complex major structures for structural adequacy, zoning and general compliance with governing laws, codes, ordinances and regulations.

– Making independent engineering analyses on proposed buildings when required to justify the structural safety of design.

– Working closely with and giving information to professional engineers, architects, contractors and the general public regarding building code, zoning and general requirements concerning buildings and structures.

– Coordinating effectively with Development Service partners e.g. Planning, Fire Prevention, Public Works, Environmental Services for plan review consistency and streamlining permit process.

– Issuing permits after review of plans.

– Advising building inspectors on structural, fire and life-safety challenges arising in the field during the construction of a building project.

– Instructing inspectors and technicians in the review of simple building plans.

– Conducting safety assessments of older buildings and assisting in enforcing compliance with the City’s Disaster Response Plan.

– Performing observational review of critical structural elements of the projects under construction.

To view the full announcement for this exciting opportunity with the City of San José and to apply online, please visit the City of San José’s employment page at, under Open Competitive Recruitments

Job Requirements:

Minimum Qualifications

Education: A Bachelor’s Degree from an accredited college or university in Architectural, Civil Engineering, Structural Engineering, or a closely related field (e.g. Construction Management). *An EIT certificate is not acceptable as replacement for the required Bachelor’s degree.*

Experience: Associate Engineers working in the Building Division as plan reviewers must have four (4) years of progressively responsible experience in professional civil engineering work with at least two (2) years of experience in design and construction of buildings.

Licenses or Certificates:

-Registered as a Civil Engineer or Architect with the State of California (candidates are required to submit proof of registration when applying).

-Valid California driver’s license.

Employment Eligibility: Federal law requires all employees to provide verification of their eligibility to work in this country. Please be informed that the City of San José will not prepare or file a labor condition application with the Department of Labor.


There were some knowledge questions.  (S)he have no issue with those questions.  If you want to judge whether someone is fit to review plans, they should have a basic understanding of the California Building Code.

  1. Name the seismic vertical and horizontal irregularities and examples of each.
  1. Name the lateral systems and building materials you have designed with. (S)he has designed with quite a few systems.
  1. State what the omega factor is used for. (This is ironic because the plan reviewer from the city of San Jose did not know what it was.  (S)he knows this for a fact because (s)he received it in an email.)
  1. State the four requirements for podium construction according to the California Building Code. Those four requirements are the lower structure was 10 times stiffer than the upper structure, the period of the entire structure shall not be 10% bigger than that of the upper structure and the upper portion and lower portions shall be designed using their respective R & rho values.  (S)he was told by the panel (s)he was completely wrong!  If these people cannot read the code, we can only imagine how they read plans.

There was NO written multiple choice test where applicants would have to know the structural engineering code in its entirety.  If they had one, people would be least likely to deal with reviewers with no common sense.

Some questions they asked had no possible way of happening in the course of your career.

  1. (S)he was asked about a time about having lots of deadlines at the same time and what (s)he did about it. (S)he mentioned how (s)he would work with the owners to see which project they really needed.  If (s)he would not be able to get to a project within a deadline, then (s)he would notify his/her customer why this would happen.  In his/her personal experience, the city of San Jose has never done this.
  1. (S)he was asked what (s)he would do when a customer contacted him/her about the status of plans that were not reviewed by all disciplines. (S)he said (s)he would release them under the stated condition that other disciplines have not reviewed the plans yet. This would be beneficial because the engineer or architect may have additional information to resolve the plan review comments.   This city is so backwards they do not have electronic plan submittals so they could see for themselves.  By having someone answer the phone, the city of San Jose is unnecessarily wasting time.


If people are going to lie to applicant’s faces in an interview, then they should expect to answer questions about their lies.  (S)he know they are lies because no one in their right mind would work for the city of San Jose after hearing these questions in interviews.  So (s)he decided to ask them in front of everyone.  Keep in mind these people do not know what happens during their own interview process.  Here are the issues (s)he raised during my interview:

  1. (S)he asked them about how the second interview was set up. They told him/her it would be an in-person interview.  They told him/her they always did it.  When (s)he asked them about the time they turned it to a four-minute in-person phone interview, they all drew a blank look.  (S)he did mention that (s)he broadcasted it on the radio in LA and that the entire phone conversation was on a speakerphone in front of LA County Sheriff’s Deputies.  These people drew blank faces.  Apparently, these people have never heard that any mike in the form of a cell phone is a live mic.
  1. (S)he asked the panel how the position became available. These people could not answer the question.  If someone is part of that department, (s)he would expect them to know why they are advertising for help.  This means they have major personnel problems.  Someone asked him/her whether they fire someone before they are eligible to become part of a Union.  (S)he does not know if this is true, but (s)he would not be surprised.
  1. (S)he asked the panel if anyone at the City Planning Building & Code Enforcement Division ever took a $30K pay cut. They all claimed that never happened.  When (s)he mentioned that their boss mentioned it in my interview, they were clueless and claimed it wasn’t true.  So (s)he played back the audio and boy were they speechless.
  1. (S)he asked them whether they encountered their boss altering official approved plans to cause life safety issues during the course of their employment. They gave him/her blank stares.  This was an interview question given to him/her by their boss.
  1. (S)he asked them whether they valued integrity. They kept telling him/her they did.  The only problem with that is that one of their plan review engineers James Son was busted by the state of California for publishing exact questions from the California Structural Engineering Exam and selling them for hundreds of dollars a pop.  This is a pretty important exam because of the seismic safety laws we have in California.


  1. (S)he asked the interview panel about an NBC Bay Area featured the city of San Jose neglecting their duty in enforcing accessibility requirements. They drew complete blanks.  (S)he would have expected them to at least know something about it and/or come up with a reason.
  1. (S)he asked them whether everyone had to have a California Professional Engineering License and a Building Plans Examiner certification to work in this position. The panel told him/her yes. Even their own ad calls this a Requirement.  There is one major problem with this: they have at least two reviewers with no engineering license whatsoever on their staff.  These reviewers were so bad they do not know how to communicate.  His/her recent plan check experience with the city of San Jose demonstrates they hire reviewers with no engineering expertise on lateral systems like plywood shear walls, or had never even knew how to use an engineering scale (which 3rd graders understood in one minute), or even finding a collector on a plan with the words COLLECTOR all over the plans.  The city of San Jose has unlicensed reviewers in the names of Kia Goudarzi and Su Tran.


These people have no licenses according to the State Board for Professional Engineers.  You can confirm this for yourself by entering their last names in the state database.


This was especially important because a few engineers passed themselves off as professionals and were not even licensed.


  1. The panel told him/her they had no buddy system, so if a plan review engineer gets a building type they are not familiar with, you are expected to educate the plan review engineer instead of the city staff. This is meaningless when they have not even had a basic engineering course in the subject matter.  Recently, (s)he had a plan review engineer who have never even taken a wood design course at all.  Kia Goudarzi the plan review engineer could not understand simple concepts such as shear, moment, and deflection.   We believe the only reason the city hires these inexperienced people is so they can rack up the plan review fees that owners and clients pay.  This is a major ripoff!
  1. (S)he asked the panel if they ever sent incorrect code interpretations to customers. They denied it – until (s)he showed them copies of the emails and the notes from a recent meeting with them.  In one email, they had told him/her it was OK to place a collector through a fire wall.  When the plan reviewer Kia Goudarzi was asked in person the same exact question, guess what?  It was not allowed.  The interview panel looked like a deer in headlights.
  1. Our last and most favorite thing the interview panel stated to hm/her was that they never read the resumes of their applicants. In fact, they are so bad they never even check public records requests.  When someone says this, it means they have absolutely no idea what their job entails.  Imagine if these people were dating someone of the opposite sex.  If one of them showed up on the Megan’s Law registry, would they ignore it?

Obviously they turned him/her down.  We are not surprised by it because the city of San Jose is run by complete idiots.  Why interview someone 10 times for a position?  A few people think they are using this person as a qualified white person to claim they interviewed all the qualified people.  Interview panels should not be upset that (s)he knew the questions beforehand because (s)he was interviewed 10 times.  If you have to interview someone 10 times for a position and not give them the offer, you have a major problem.  The only reason we believe the city of San Jose does this is because someone or some people named Lisa Joiner, Chu Chang, John Chiang, and Marc Garcia may want their egos stroked.


We know of other issues they have.  For example, we have brought two California cities to having the cheapest insurance rates for homeowners.  You would think San Jose would want this because Mayor Sam Liccardo keeps campaigning he wants to lower the costs for business.  You would be dead wrong!  We were told by their interview panels composed of Chu Chang, Lisa Joiner, Marc Garcia, and John Chiang it didn’t matter!  We guess some of their staff maybe in the pocket of Big Insurance – we don’t know!  We wonder what San Jose Mayor Liccardo is doing to promote saving.  Based on our organization’s encounter with the Planning, Building, and Code Enforcement Department, absolutely nothing!


Insurance for homeowners is not the only major issue.   Having bad reviewers is stressful on every engineer and architect who submits plans.  If you are depending on the city of San Jose for advice, don’t do it because they will cause plenty of aggravation.  They are incompetent in the worst possible way.  Many people have seen the movie 50 First Dates and may recall the character known as 10-second Tom.  Well, folks, these reviewers are exactly like 10 Second Tom.

We had a recent bad review from the city of San Jose.  This plan reviewer Kia Goudarzi was so bad he lost the plan review response letter printed in color and on 30 lb paper, couldn’t read a table of contents for calculations, and had no common sense.


Most people would be pretty upset about their bad experience.  We decided to have fun and showed people how dumb the city of San Jose is.  We asked a grocery store clerk, a waiter, and a fry cook from In N Out to find the collectors on the plans.  This is pretty easy because the word “COLLECTOR” was on them.  They found it but the San Jose Plan Reviewer Kia Goudarzi could not.

We asked that aplicant’s 3rd-grade daughter whether a 10 foot beam would be ok if that beam could span 13 feet given the identical loading.  She got the question correct in 5 seconds while the San Jose plan reviewer Kia Goudarzi failed to get it right at all.  This should have been easy to the plan reviewer because this could have happened in any material:  steel, concrete, or CMU.  The San Jose Plan Checker failed miserably.

As for our ideas to help the city of San Jose, we decided to show those off too.  We made sure we mentioned they were not allowed compliments of the Chief Building Official and Ethnocentric Corruptor Chu Chang.  We made sure we mentioned where he got his degree:  University of Texas at Austin.


We have a message for San Jose’s Chief Building Official Chu Chang:

“CBO, you apparently have 99 problems in your division and you are a big one!  CBO, you do not get to tell applicants they do not belong in structural engineering.  CBO, that applicant has that California license for a reason!  You would not like it if that applicant performed illegal discrimination against Asians.  If that applicant wants to review building designs because he/she is qualified, you have no right to tell him/her to get out of the engineering profession because it makes you feel inferior.  If (s)he wants to do this because (s)he enjoys it, that is his/her business and not yours.  You do you!”


Recently, the City of San Jose posted the position again.  There are many reasons to post it again.  We think they either do not pay well, the candidates selected turned the job down, they are looking for inexperienced engineers who will not question what someone tells them (which we posted two of them), or they’re just wasting the candidate’s precious time. I would like to ask the Chief Building Official Chu Chang, the Ethnocentric Corruptor why he went to the San Jose Mercury News and kept stating they cannot find engineers to work for them.  We wonder if he is doing this for free publicity.  We personally think it is all of these things.  We also know Chu Chang or someone at the city of San Jose removed a member’s LinkedIn profile for discussing their interview experience.  Folks, we have written this so you don’t waste your time.  So spread the word today.


Wilmore-sadHave you ever wanted to waste your time applying for jobs that don’t exist? Have you ever wanted to waste $5 a gallon gas for something that’s almost completely useless? Have you ever wanted to decide between feeding your family and getting a non-existent job?

Well, you can do that by applying for a job as a Structural Engineer at Santa Rosa based MKM & Associates, founded by Larry Miyano. These principals shall remain nameless but go by the initials of Larry Miyano, SE; Eric Kraeger, SE; and John Cook, SE. At MKM & Associates, you will get to be told in person that they don’t have to work even though they placed an ad in the SEAONC website or on Craigslist.  Ironically, they design churches, so we guess they never read the Commandment stating Thou Shalt Not Bear False Witness. This really proves they are not LEEDers, but structural stupid-ists. Why have a potential employee waste gas on coming to an interview of a non-existent job when the information could have been disseminated over the phone or through Skype?

Check out the email Larry Miyano sent to an applicant:

If MKM knew the job was already filled before the candidate got there, why didn’t they call the candidate up and tell the candidate that the job was filled? Perhaps MKM is partying like it’s 1989 because they apparently do not believe the use of technology to make their work easier! This incident makes Dr. Evil say: Why must I be surrounded by fr**k*n’ idiots?  The alleged real reason MKM makes people show up: to get candidates to show their work samples because the associates there cannot come up with ideas of their own. It’s like getting candidates to do their thinking work for free! Even worse yet, it’s a sick a twisted way to get them to give them potential new clients.

Larry Miyano is proof the structural engineering profession is very unethical.  He can claim the bad actor excuse all he wants, but the fact is that he really is unethical.
At MKM & Associates, they didn’t invent discrimination against the long-term unemployed – they just perpetrate it. Folks, how many companies post ads in the SEAONC website and Craigslist only to later tell you in an interview that they are not hiring? It merely means they either have no actual work or they practice job discrimination or it could be completely something different such as keeping the firm’s name out there in the public to give the appearance of expanding when they really are not.  It clearly demonstrates they lack the ability to plan their future hiring needs. Why else would someone call a potential employee in for an interview only to later be told the firm doesn’t have the work? This sounds like a firm that is an accomplice to blacklisting of worthy individuals, then? Perhaps!

MKM & Associates did some pretty bad things like not check excellent references of candidates. It makes people wonder whether they participate in the blacklisting of others. MKM & Associates can be best characterized as sheep-le!  At MKM & Associates, they didn’t invent blacklisting and discrimination against the long-term unemployed, they just perpetrate it. Why else would they have a candidate come to a job interview for a non-existent job?
If you folks out there thought that was bad, check out what they told this potential employee through an email that we have received. Larry Miyano and the principals stated by email they would rather overwork their employees than to hire one to pick up the slack. Insurance companies have seen this email and love it because they will make more money off MKM in insurance claims. Sounds like MKM has slaves instead of ethical human beings, don’t you think?

Here is the email that was sent to the applicant:

Thanks for interviewing with us last Friday. We were impressed by the engineering work product you created on some of your past projects.

At our Principal’s meeting this morning, we decided that we don’t have enough projected future work at this time to hire an additional structural engineer on a full-time basis. Unfortunately, it’s still better to run a little “lean” during the economy’s slow recovery.

Thanks again for you interest in MKM. We hope that many large projects are in our future!

Larry Miyano, Principal

MKM & Associates
structural engineering
441 College Avenue
Santa Rosa, CA 95401

Phone: (707) 578-8185
FAX: (707) 578-7153

That’s quite a different toned email than the one that was sent earlier.

As a result of these tactics, it’s now time to reveal to the public at large who these people are, who they work with, who they do business with, and what buildings they have designed. After all, if a firm is good at wasting a potential employee’s time and money, what stops them from wasting their clients’ time and money? Nothing, apparently! Now if they want to apologize to this individual for wasting his/her time, they are welcome to do so!  For right now, let’s list the buildings they have designed. After all, it’s easier to avoid a business when you know they discriminate against the long-term unemployed.

Recently, a car was spotted with signs about the emails and bad interviews.

418 B Street Office Building, Santa Rosa Whole Foods, Coddington, Santa Rosa Codding Bank, Rohnert Park
HRE Phase II, Reno, NV

Pacific Theaters, Rohnert Park
10th Street Office Building, Santa Rosa
Oakmead North Bay Industrial Park, Petaluma

Micro-Vu Corporation Phase 1 & 2, Windsor, CA
World of Carpets Avenues Stores, Santa Rosa
Mt. Storm Forest Products, Santa Rosa
Windsor Palms Plaza, Windsor, CA
Yardbirds Plaza, Petaluma

Anderson/Ayer Residence, Nicasio, CA
Hoffee Residence, South Kohola, HI
Horn Residence, Santa Rosa, CA
Kuimelis Residence, Healdsburg
Friedman Estate, Santa Rosa
H.F.I. (Nintendo), Kohola Coast, HI
Schwab Residence, Mauna Kea Fairways North, HI
Jurika Residence, Hawaii
Batinovich Residence, Hawaii
Hall Residence, Kona, HI

Fairway Knoll Townhomes, Santa Rosa, CA
Sonoma State University Student
Apartments Community and
Multi-Purpose Buildings, Rohnert Park, CA
Skyhawk Subdivision, Santa Rosa, CA
Monte Vista Villas, Oakland, CA
Parc Place, Milpitas, CA

NNC Student Dormitory, Nampa, ID
Idaho Center, Nampa, ID
Nampa Law Enforcement Building, Nampa, ID
Santa Rosa Firefighters Training Facility
Novato Fire Station
Nampa Fire Station #2, Nampa, ID
Duncan Mills Fire Station, Duncan Mills, CA
DeMeo Teen Center, Santa Rosa, CA
Mt. Tamalpais School, Mill Valley, CA
Reno High School New Theater, Reno, NV
Calistoga High School, Calistoga, CA
McNear Elementary School Addition and Renovation, Petaluma, CA
Mountain Shadows Middle School, Rohnert Park, CA
Casa Grande High School, Petaluma, CA

Roshambo Winery, Healdsburg
Franciscan Winery Visitor Center and Offices, Rutherford, CA
Trione Winery, Geyserville, CA
Lake Sonoma Winery, Geyserville, CA
Kendall-Jackson Winery Warehouse and Barrel Storage, Santa Rosa & Windsor, CA
Vineyard 29, St. Helena, CA
Michel-Schlumberger Vineyards, Healdsburg, CA
Harlan East Winery, Napa, CA
Spottswood Winery, St. Helena, CA
Seghesio Winery, Healdsburg, CA
Lamareaux Landing, Valois, NY
Quivera Winery, Healdsburg, CA

Sonoma City Hall (Retrofit), Sonoma, CA
Fountain Grove Round Barn, Santa Rosa, CA
Santa Rosa Railroad Depot, Santa Rosa, CA
Sebastopol Cooperative, Sebastopol, CA
Mayette Village Shopping Center, Santa Rosa, CA
Town & Country, Santa Rosa, CA
Sebastopol Veterans Memorial Building, Sebastopol, CA
Canyon Road Winery, Geyserville, CA
Petaluma Railroad Depot, Petaluma, CA
Stonehouse, Santa Rosa, CA
Upton Building, Santa Rosa, CA
Holiz Building, Sonoma, CA
Native Sons of the Golden West, Santa Rosa, CA
Duhring Building, Sonoma, CA
El Paseo, Somona, CA
Mueller Hatchery, St. Helena, CA

St. Andrew Presbyterian Church, Sonoma
St. Elizabeth Seton, Rohnert Park
St. Rose Multi-Purpose (Catholic), Santa Rosa
West Santa Rosa Baptist Church, West Sebastopol Road, Santa Rosa
Camp Armstrong (Catholic), McGucken Center, Occidental, CA
St. Rose Elementary (Catholic), Santa Rosa
Stony Point Christian Fellowship, Santa Rosa
Our Lady of Guadalupe Church (Catholic), Windsor, CA
Resurrection Parish (Catholic), Santa Rosa
St. George Orthodox Church, Rohnert Park
Holy Spirit (Catholic), Santa Rosa
St. Mark Lutheran, Santa Rosa
Evangelical Free, Santa Rosa
Skyview Seminary, Nampa, ID
St. Philip Parish (Catholic) Addition, Occidental, CA
Church of Jesus Christ Latter Day Saints, Santa Rosa
North Point Chapel (Latter day Saints), Santa Rosa
New Life Christian, Petaluma, CA

Oakmont Senior Care Facility, Concord, CA
Oakmont Senior Care Facility, Chino Hills, CA
Oakmont Senior Care Facility, Las Vegas, NV
Fresno Assisted Care Facility
Petaluma Senior Assisted Care Facility
Renovista Ridge Senior Assisted Care Facility, Reno, NV
Windsor Senior Assisted Care Facility, Windsor, CA
Canine Companions for Independence
Campus & Training facility, Santa Rosa, CA
Jewish Home for the Aged, San Francisco, CA

Sheraton Suites, Petaluma
Fountain Grove Inn & Restaurant, Santa Rosa
Marie Callenders, Santa Rosa
Southbridge, St. Helena
Sonoma Valley Inn, Sonoma, CA
Mandeville Inn, Calistoga, CA
El Pueblo Motel, Sonoma, CA
Fountain Golf Course, Santa Rosa, CA
Alliance Redwoods, Santa Rosa

And here are the list of clients they associate themselves with:

Avila Architects
AXIA Architects
BCV Architects
Corson Associates
Lail Design
Ryan Associates (contractor)
Starck Architecture


Time to shine our light on another dumb structural engineering firm – and when we say dumb, this means dumb about running some aspects of their firm.  This firm is not only dumb at that, but very heartless as well.  And you will not believe who it is.  This structural engineering firm is Buehler & Buehler Structural Engineers!

No we are not talking about this Buehler.


For the folks out there who have never heard of Buehler & Buehler, it is a structural engineering firm founded in 1946 in Sacramento, CA, with offices in San Francisco, Phoenix, and Los Angeles.  They are widely known for designing a variety of projects, but we know them from their work on DSA projects years ago.  These engineers may know how to design buildings, but they do not know how to recruit qualified people to their firm.  We have proof of this.

An applicant recently responded to an ad.  We have posted it for reference.


This is a great opportunity for the applicant.  (S)he loves designing public schools because it is a need. (S)he have also reviewed buildings, so having both experiences is an asset.

But there is a major issue here with this ad.  It requires that (s)he has to live in LA first before (s)he even apply.  Nothing shows red flags like requiring people to live in the area before they decide to work there.

LoriBurbridge BBSE

Lori Burbridge is the UC Davis dimwit who has a B.S. in Political Science and Sociology and a Ph D in Bad Answers!

Buehler & Buehler has some major issues.  In fact, based on this ad alone and the email (s)he received, we would say they are anti-employee.  We want to emphasize we do not believe their engineers may not be like this, but based on my encounter with their marketing person, this is definitely the case.  Let me explain why we feel this way.

  1. Let’s say (s)he lives in an area where the climate is making him/her sick such as allergies like Austin, TX, I would not be able to work for Buehler & Buehler because (s)he would have to live in LA first.  Why would someone want to move to LA first without a job?  That is pretty dumb.  You need money to live in California.
  1. What if (s)he were moving to be close to a sick family member? According to Buehler & Buehler, (s)he would not be able to apply for that position because (s)he does not live in LA.  And who wants to relocate just to take care of a sick parent if they do not have a job?  No one we know of.
  1. What if (s)he wanted to be closer to my family and friends? (S)he cannot do that if (s)he do not have a job because (s)he needs money to live.  But (s)he would not work for Buehler and Buehler because (s)he would have to live in LA first before (s)he is allowed to work there.

What Buehler & Buehler may not have counted on is that this will be discussed in Congress.  There was a recent bill introduced on July 6th called the Lift the Relocation Burden on the Military Spouses Act.  This allows spouses of military members to transfer their professional licenses easier like Professional Engineers like this aplicant when they move with their spouses.  This is a great bill.


We got a big laugh out of a person who believes that her job is to find excellence.  We found out one of her talks.


How can this woman marketing manager know excellence when she is restricting candidates based on a geographic area?

Based on the email the applicant received from Buehler & Buehler, it doesn’t necessarily make you employable because you have to live in the area first.  When is living in LA a job requirement?  It is like believing that eating alphabet soup would increase your vocabulary.

Did you know Buehler & Buehler designed the Beale AFB Global Hawk Dormitory?  That is a big fat slap in the face, folks!

There are other issues.  This person has worked in the LA area for two years.  (S)he was staying in a hotel working for a building department.  (S)he developed some of the engineering standards many of the LA County communities use.  Also, (s)he has a California SE License.  Does this mean that because (s)he do not live in LA, (s)he cannot work for Buehler & Buehler?  Of course not!  Technology such as computers and high speed internet make it easier to communicate with clients over miles and miles.  But if it’s up to that marketing director at Buehler & Buehler, you cannot do that.

After (s)he received that email, this video seems a little hypocritical.  The engineers may mean well, but the firm cannot succeed if they cannot find people.  People will love the firm’s response to Commitment.  In the applicant’s case, it is a Commitment to use every excuse to reject candidates from working at that firm.


Initially, we were a little let down when we got this email.  But then we decided to do something about it.  We have decided to publicize this email and use it as a marketing tool.

  1. If you are an attorney looking at a construction defect case, you can use this email to show how bad the firm is at recruiting engineers. We will email it to them for their use.

  2. If you are an architect, would you hire Buehler & Buehler? We would say a big fat no based on my encounter with their marketing person until they apologized to me personally!

  3. If you are a contractor and have trouble with an engineer, you can now rest assured that Buehler & Buehler has problems based on the email we received from them. That means Buehler & Buehler will have to pay much higher insurance premiums.

  4. If you are a competing structural engineering firm, you can use this to recruit engineers away from Buehler & Buehler.

Right now, we are distributing this email to lots of people.  We will be going across California and showing it off to everyone.  And it will be in very public places.  Want to go to Costco and get your groceries?  You can learn about Buehler & Buehler: no problem.  Expect to see it at LA Live, the Santa Monica Pier, the State Capitol, DSA Offices, anywhere there is big masses of people.

If they are rejecting qualified candidates for reasons this stupid, do you think they will find anyone?  We are calling on the President of the firm to address this issue immediately with us personally.  If not, we will just keep showing this email off to everyone – and we mean everyone!  Unlike that bar Cheers, it is not necessary a good thing when everyone knows your name:  Buehler & Buehler!


ScottHooker BBSE

One person contacted CEO Scott Hooker of Buehler & Buehler!  (pictured above)  Scott Hooker was quite upset over the bad publicity and claimed the issue was caused by bad actors!  The problem here is that the entire profession of structural engineering is 100% bad actors.  The only way this will stop is if the reputation of the structural engineering profession is destroyed so badly that no one will ever want to be one.  Scott Hooker needs to prove to the public that structural engineers are not like the ones people have encountered.  Scott Hooker was quite shocked to learn the media ranks them worse than lint and most STDs.  Scott Hooker was also shocked that this group is destroying other businesses!  He needs to look in the mirror to understand why people hate his profession so much.  Saying that his firm doesn’t act unprofessional is useless unless he shows applicants that he puts his money where his mouth is.

And since Scott Hooker says they need someone who knows the LA market, we have a much better idea.  We believe the LA market should know them.  This is why we have decided to spread the word about Buehler & Buehler.  Think of Buehler & Buehler as that name people think isn’t nice so they will remember it twice!  Go to shopping centers and malls and display Buehler & Buehler as that bad structural engineering firm you should run from – like the bubonic plague.  Scott Hooker told this person they would get back to him/her right away.  This is a lie Scott Hooker told just to keep people off that firm’s back.  Typical!  So typical!  Savage individuals like Scott Hooker cannot even follow his own rules!

Also, another candidate applied to Buehler & Buehler.  That candidate was promised that they would be considered when more positions were available.  The problem is that this never happened at all!  Folks, this proves that Structural Engineers are the biggest liars in the engineering profession.  As a result, the profession must be permanently humiliated.

Folks, start spreading the word.  Use the name Buehler & Buehler for other words.  Go onto Twitter & Facebook and state that Buehler & Buehler is pretty bad.  Buehler & Buehler is structural stupidity you can count on!





Have you ever wanted to get screwed by an employer?  Have you ever wanted to interact with 21st Century Nazis?  Well now you can by applying for career opportunities that have Human Resource Managers and/or Recruiters like Puerto Rican Nazi Adriana Gonzalez aka Adriana Pittenger.

Knowing Puerto Rican Nazi Adriana Gonzalez aka Adriana Pittenger as we do, will future employees and employers be caught helpless by her?  Of course not!  Let us explain why you need to watch out for her.

Recently, Puerto Rican Nazi Adriana Gonzalez aka Adriana Pittenger and her unethical structural engineering firm DeSimone Consulting Engineers had a potential LinkedIn member’s account cancelled because (s)he raised issues of unethical recruiting practices committed by Puerto Rican Nazi Adriana Gonzalez aka Adriana Pittenger.  What are these ethics issues?  Just look at the emails Puerto Rican Nazi Adriana Gonzalez aka Adriana Pittenger sent in response to a career opportunity as a Senior Project Engineer in the firm’s San Francisco office as an example of her stupidity.

On August 7, 2014, the following email was sent by DeSimone Consulting Engineers to the job applicant for the firm’s Senior Project Engineer position in their San Francisco office:

“Dear Applicant,

We appreciate you taking the time in submitting your resume for our open position.

We will review your application and contact you should your qualifications match our current needs.

Thank you for choosing DeSimone Consulting Engineers as your potential employer.


Adriana Gonzalez aka Adriana Pittenger

DeSimone Consulting Engineers

Human Resources”

On August 14, 2014, the unthinkable happened.  Adriana Gonzalez sent this response to the applicant:

Hello Mr(s) XXX,

My name is Adriana Gonzalez and I am the HR Recruiter at DeSimone Consulting Engineers. I would like to speak to you about an Engineer position we are currently recruiting for in our Las Vegas office.

I am available today and tomorrow before 6 pm to discuss the position further. Please e-mail me and let me know what day and time is best to reach you to schedule a phone call.

I look forward to your reply.

Kind regards,

Adriana M. Gonzalez

Adriana Gonzalez aka Adriana Pittenger
Human Resources Recruiter

DeSimone Consulting Engineers
Miami, FL”

See that email, folks?  Puerto Rican Nazi Adriana Gonzalez aka Adriana Pittenger admits that the position is in Las Vegas instead of San Francisco like Puerto Rican Nazi Adriana Gonzalez aka Adriana Pittenger advertised in the LinkedIn ad.  If you cannot tell the difference between a city in a desert and a city on the Pacific Ocean, you should not be in HR period.  Puerto Rican Nazi Adriana’s brain is best suited for reading about Human resources practices and definitely not working in it!

The candidate has wanted to clear up this mistake in person.  Unfortunately for the candidate, this never occurred because Puerto Rican Nazi Adriana Gonzalez aka Adriana Pittenger never allowed the person to set up an interview appointment.  Puerto Rican Nazi Adriana Gonzalez aka Adriana Pittenger was too stupid to return the phone call that was left on her voice mail.

“Hello Mr(s) XXXs,

It was nice speaking to you today. We would like to schedule a face interview with you. The interview will be in our San Francisco office.

When is the best time and date for you? Please provide me with a few options on your availability so I can coordinate accordingly.

Thank you,

Adriana M. Gonzalez

Adriana Gonzalez aka Adriana Pittenger
Human Resources Recruiter

DeSimone Consulting Engineers
Miami, FL 33131

That phone call never happened.  It is easy for someone from California to see if Puerto Rican Nazi Adriana Gonzalez aka Adriana Pittenger called because she is based in Florida.  Miami has a 305 area code.

Check out her deceiving job ads!


Is this what they teach at Central Michigan University – to be unethical?  Yes, Puerto Rican Nazi Adriana Gonzalez aka Adriana Pittenger is a Constitutional Stupidist, so stupid that she cannot constitutionally count past 1 because Puerto Rican Nazi Adriana Gonzalez aka Adriana Pittenger has never heard of the First Amendment called Freedom of Speech.  Knowing Puerto Rican Nazi Adriana Gonzalez aka Adriana Pittenger, she believes that other people should not be afforded the protection of the Constitution because it makes her look bad!

Puerto Rican Nazi Adriana Gonzalez aka Adriana Pittenger had over 18 months to resolve the issue of the botched interview.  That never happened.  Puerto Rican Nazi Adriana Gonzalez aka Adriana Pittenger was even told how to resolve the issue in the LinkedIn post she removed:  by calling the person and even rescheduling the interview.  But what did Puerto Rican Nazi Adriana Gonzalez aka Adriana Pittenger do instead?  Puerto Rican Nazi Adriana Gonzalez aka Adriana Pittenger chose to ignore it because she thought it would go away.  Guess what, Adriana?  This will not go away for the rest of her natural life!

We bet Puerto Rican Nazi Adriana Gonzalez aka Adriana Pittenger was told by the owner and/or principals of DeSimone Consulting Engineers to address the issue.  Puerto Rican Nazi Adriana Gonzalez aka Adriana Pittenger lied about addressing it because it was never done.  As a result, Puerto Rican Nazi Adriana Gonzalez aka Adriana Pittenger was fired.  Puerto Rican Nazi Adriana Gonzalez aka Adriana Pittenger lied like a rug.  Puerto Rican Nazi Adriana Gonzalez aka Adriana Pittenger is literally a Jim Jones disciple who wants everyone to drink her Kool-Aid.

DeSimone Consulting Engineers is a business of structural engineers that design buildings, many of them by world-renown architects.  What statement is DeSimone sending to the public and their clients when HR Manager Adriana Gonzalez is acting so untrustworthy?  A pretty bad example, if you ask us!

Then Puerto Rican Nazi Adriana Gonzalez aka Adriana Pittenger had the audacity to contact that person and tell them to remove the LinkedIn post instead of addressing the issue 18 months later.  Puerto Rican Nazi Adriana Gonzalez aka Adriana Pittenger did everything but take responsibility for the problems she caused.  Puerto Rican Nazi Adriana Gonzalez aka Adriana Pittenger blamed her problems on men because DeSimone is composed of men such as Vincent J. DeSimone, PE, FACI, F. ASCE, Hon. Ph.D.  Puerto Rican Nazi Adriana Gonzalez aka Adriana Pittenger then stated that she did runs ads for Ghost Ads – where the jobs don’t exist at all.  Puerto Rican Nazi Adriana Gonzalez aka Adriana Pittenger then had the audacity to tell the applicant she screwed that (s)he was not supposed to be upset about it.  Adriana needs to understand things called feelings.

Guess Puerto Rican Nazi Adriana Gonzalez aka Adriana Pittenger thought that by removing evidence of the email, she thought that people out there would not know what she did.  This is why Puerto Rican Nazi Adriana Gonzalez aka Adriana Pittenger filed a complaint with LinkedIn because it made her look bad.  I wonder what other crimes Puerto Rican Nazi Adriana Gonzalez aka Adriana Pittenger would commit.  Based on this encounter, Puerto Rican Nazi Adriana Gonzalez aka Adriana Pittenger is not a member of the reality-based community.  What Puerto Rican Nazi Adriana Gonzalez aka Adriana Pittenger fails to realize is that she would have been much better off to resolve the issue instead of removing that person’s LinkedIn account.  That person was networked to several of DeSimone’s employees and clients.  Guess Puerto Rican Nazi Adriana Gonzalez aka Adriana Pittenger didn’t want people to know what she did!

Puerto Rican Nazi Adriana Gonzalez aka Adriana Pittenger had the audacity to ask people to remove her name from the LinkedIn post.  Guess Puerto Rican Nazi Adriana Gonzalez aka Adriana Pittenger forgot she was the one who sent those nasty emails.  This means Puerto Rican Nazi Adriana Gonzalez aka Adriana Pittenger participates in evidence destruction.  Just imagine what happens when her firm fires people.  We can imagine Puerto Rican Nazi Adriana Gonzalez aka Adriana Pittenger lies about people’s unemployment claims to avoid paying them out.  Puerto Rican Nazi Adriana Gonzalez aka Adriana Pittenger is definitely a member of 4-H, short for Huh, Hey, Hadn’t Heard It Was Unethical, and Heck if She Knows!

If this is how Puerto Rican Nazi Adriana Gonzalez aka Adriana Pittenger acts when someone points out an issue such as interviewing the person for the wrong office, just imagine how Puerto Rican Nazi Adriana Gonzalez aka Adriana Pittenger will be as a recruiter in her next firm.  Anyone who hires this woman needs to watch out because they will be harmed in the same way.

And you have to wonder whether Adriana is educated at all.  According to public records, Puerto Rican Nazi Adriana Gonzalez aka Adriana Pittenger is a 2011 graduate of Florida International University with a bachelor degree in Hospitality Management and a 2014 graduate of Central Michigan University with a Master of Science in Administration and a concentration in Human Resources.  Based on her actions, we say NO!  Bet her professors at Florida International University are embarrassed big time!

These comparisons are simple: Bill Cosby is to sexual assault as Puerto Rican Nazi Adriana Gonzalez aka Adriana Pittenger is to human resources manager.

Puerto Rican Nazi Adriana Gonzalez aka Adriana Pittenger does not need an advanced degree to know she is not good at her job in Human Resources.  After all, this woman has failed to keep jobs for a long time.  According to public records, Puerto Rican Nazi Adriana Gonzalez aka Adriana Pittenger worked:

As a Sales Associate at Kenneth Cole between 2005 to 2008

As a Guest Service Agent for Le Meridien Hotels, February 2006 to October 2007

A First Impression Officer at the St Regis Hotel from July 2008 to May 2009

A Guest Service Agent at Trump International Hotel between May & December 2009

A Guest Service Agent at the Canyon Ranch Hotel & Spa between January 2010 and February 2011

A Human Resources Coordinator at JW Marriott Motel Miami between February 2011 and October 2012

A Personal Cruise Consultant at Norweigan Cruise Lines in October 2012

After doing things like this, do you think American tax payers should financially bail out Puerto Rico?  Based on Puerto Rican Nazi Adriana Gonzalez aka Adriana Pittenger, the answer is a big fat no!

Puerto Rican Nazi Adriana Gonzalez aka Adriana Pittenger is so bad she is now being used as a case study to get rid of recruiters and Human Resources Departments nationwide.  After all, Puerto Rican Nazi Adriana Gonzalez aka Adriana Pittenger is a case study where they are a detriment to a company and need to be abolished permanently.  And she can now experience the wrath of all those HR professionals whose jobs she has endangered.

Based on this job history, would you hire Puerto Rican Nazi Adriana Gonzalez aka Adriana Pittenger?  The answer is a big fat no if you have one brain cell.  If a firm does, we will out them and put them out of business.  Puerto Rican Nazi Adriana Gonzalez aka Adriana Pittenger should be thought of as Adriana Noonien Singh because she is unethical, ruthless, and not hesitate to destroy the reputations of innocent job seekers.  She should be thought of as Adriana Stavro Blofeld because she is just as evil as namesake Ernst!  Based on the DeSimone encounter, Puerto Rican Nazi Adriana Gonzalez aka Adriana Pittenger should not even be involved in Human Resources at any company period!  Adriana Gonzalez aka Adriana Pittenger is after all a macrobitch with a microbrain!

As many of you may not even know, Puerto Rican Nazi Adriana Gonzalez aka Adriana Pittenger has been fired.  She contacted the person who complained about her bad hiring practices.  Instead of addressing the issue, she decided to participate email destruction.


Folks, DeSimone Consulting Engineers has decided to change their hiring practices.  HR will no longer be interviewing the engineers.  Instead, the firm owner Stehen DeSimone will be doing it



As many of you may have heard, the 301 Mission condo tower in San Francisco is sinking into the ground.  DeSimone Consulting Engineers designed this tower.  The email docs of the bad hiring practices have been entered into evidence of the lawsuit.